This is an example of how to create clear guidelines for evaluation and grading of behavioral objectives.
Objectives are measurable |
Objectives are measurable and include specific information about what the student will be able to do,e.g. how well, how many, to what degree |
Objectives are too general and don't include specific information on what the student will be able to do, e.g.. how well, how many, to what degree
|
Objective are not measurable Objectives don't describe what the student will be able to do |
Objectives are not universally measurable and do not include what the student will be able to do |
Objectives require high levels of cognition |
Objectives reflect high levels of cognition according to Bloom's Taxonomy |
All the objectives require low levels of cognition such as "demonstrates understanding,"or "identifies" |
Objectives should include at least one of the verbs in the levels 3-6 of Bloom's Taxonomy |
Objectives don't use verbs to describe what the student will be able to do |
The learning objectives should be achievable |
The objectives listed are realistic given the time and level of the target audience |
There are too many objectives |
Objectives are too difficult |
Objectives don't use verbs to describe what the student will be able to do |
Are the goals of interest to the learner? |
The leaning objectives are of interest to the learner |
The learning objectives don't make the intrinsic and external motivation clear to the learner |
The learner can't understand the learning objectives |
The learner doesn't want to complete the tasks in the learning objectives |